Talk:North Shore & Western Line

Australia: New South Wales / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal North Shore & Western Line is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Sydney Trains T1.

Requested move 31 August 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Most people think that any change should be postponed until implementation of the new names by Sydney Trains. EdJohnston (talk) 15:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{requested move/dated}}

– So, the November 2017 timetable changes for the Sydney Trains network have been unveiled, and they're a doozy. All Sydney Trains services no longer have general names other than their badges (T1, T2, T3, ect.). Names now exclusively belong to individual stopping patterns within each service, i.e. "T1 Northern", "T1 North Shore", "T1 Epping", "T1 Richmond", and "T1 Western". Combine this with the fact that having articles titled "Epping, North Shore, Northern, Richmond, and Western Line" and "Cronulla, Eastern Suburbs, and Illawarra Line" are a bit of a handful, will often be confusing, and also won't be official general service names come November, I propose that we rename the articles according to what they'll be officially referred to - simply their badge numbers. The naming format, "x (Sydney Trains)", is based off article titles from other railway services, which disambiguate by operator and/or system name; "Red Line (Los Angeles Metro)", "Yellow Line (Montreal Metro)", "6 (New York City Subway service)", "Line A (Prague Metro)". – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · contribs · count) 05:44, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - It's not a horrible suggestion, but Sydney Trains still uses names according to their documents, including draft timetable [1]. T1 is the only one which is split, now comprised of "Western Line," "Northern Line," "North Shore & Northern Line". T2 is renamed "Inner West & Leppington Line," T3 remains "Bankstown Line," and T4 through T7 are the same, as are all intercity lines, with the new T8 "Airport & South Line." Personally, I prefer the more descriptive names which include region or location detail, rather than generic TX names. -- Whats new?^(talk) 10:25, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would wait to see what transpires once the new timetable is implemented. The current branding of the new timetable is all over the place. Take T5: sometimes it's referred to as the "T5 Cumberland Line", other times it's the "T5 Richmond and Leppington Line" and the new network map preview implies it will just be the "T5".

If we do rename all the articles, I would like to see this extend to the other modes as well. We currently have North Shore, Northern & Western Line, Sydney bus route 144, Manly ferry services and Dulwich Hill Line. The bus routes might have to be a bit inconsistent because they don't have a B prefix, but I think the other routes should all follow a consistent format.--Gareth (talk) 16:52, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree on waiting until implementation, unless further reliable detail comes out before -- Whats new?^(talk) 03:56, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Lead image

@Edgar Searle and RidingStuff: This is an article about the T1 North Shore & Western Line service. I don't understand why this article is instead depicting infrastructure as its lead image, rather than the service itself, such as rolling stock used on the service as is typical with other articles on Sydney Trains and NSW TrainLink services. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 11:23, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]