Talk:North River (South Fork Shenandoah River tributary)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the North River (South Fork Shenandoah River tributary) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Virginia Mid‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

comments

I think it quite silly to have a notability notice on a wikiproject entry. It's here because it's a member of a notable set. The proper question is what class of basin is sufficiently coarse to not get bogged down in minutiae. I think the right division was made. Tributary creeks of the next finer class of watershed division == they ought need be notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.2.166.21 (talk) 10:37, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability Tag

I placed that tag in the article, per notability guidlines, which say:

This page in a nutshell: A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.

On this page, no coverage is shown in any source (also the reason for the unreferenced tag) Just following policy KoshVorlon ".. We are ALL Kosh..." 16:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just because the article doesn't have sources in it yet, doesn't magically make it not notable. Again Kosh, you're misunderstanding notability guidelines and simply cherrypicking a sentence from one of the guideline pages. The notability tag was removed and if you really feel the Potomac tributary is non-notable, send it to AfD. --Oakshade 16:47, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]