Talk:North Palawan Block

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:North Palawan Block is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (due to such information needed to learn from this article thought it is difficult to find the source to place some references for copyright) --VonTheGreat26 (talk) 09:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another user will probably remove the speedy deletion tag if the article is significant enough to merit an article. Thanks MJ500 Fancy a coffee? 09:48, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see several academic sources for this when I search "North Palawan Block". I don't know enough to say whether it's notable on its own, but it isn't a speedy candidate. —Guan aco 09:50, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I stand corrected, geographical locations do not qualify for speedy deletion. Thanks for your time. MJ500 Fancy a coffee? 09:52, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Useless citations

Citations such as Hamilton (1979) and Taylor & Hayes (1980) are essentially useless to the reader who is not a geologist. Are these references books, or academic journal articles? These references should be inline citations, with at least titles.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 00:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]