Talk:North Carolina Highway 42

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Mid-importance).

U.S. Roads: North Carolina Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Locations	North Carolina
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Proposed split

10 miles of North Carolina Highway 42 will be renumbered as North Carolina Highway 36 according to this article. This means a separate article on the renumbering ~~will~~ may become necessary.

Draft article here.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly oppose a split at this time until it is confirmed that NC 36 will be established. They are currently having public input on the topic and editors should never assume it is a done deal. --WashuOtaku (talk) 21:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It sure looked like a done deal until I read it more carefully. We can revisit this when more is known. Doesn't seem like a good idea to me.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 23:09, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Having a draft ready is fine, sorry for being excited over it. I hope NCDOT does not do it either. --WashuOtaku (talk) 23:18, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hold up; do you not want NC 42 to be renumbered? Why? Also, my vote is wait. ChessEric 19:55, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They are not renumbering all of NC 42, just ten miles of it so people on I-40 do not get confused with it and future I-42. --WashuOtaku (talk) 21:15, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTFORUM

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

I know that, but do you not want those 10 miles to be renumbered? ChessEric 18:40, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is all very unnecessary. This is to fix of a supposed problem by creating a new problem. It is also not like we don't have precedent already with I-73/NC 73 and I-74/US 74. The easiest solution is to give NC 42 an actual road name like they do in many areas, like "Fuquay-Varina Highway" as an example. --WashuOtaku (talk) 18:58, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking the same thing actually, although I was just thinking that the confusion could easily be handled by additional signage. When I lived in Maryland, me and my family once to Cumberland, which is accessible via I-70 to I-68. About 15 miles before I-68, however, is an exit for MD 68. Maryland just used a lot of signage to make sure people didn't get the numbers mixed up, which you can see right here. Plus, they have the US 74/I-74 concurrency in the state due to I-74 being bought so far south. I guess NCDOT's mindset was that they wanted to use "36" because no other route in the state used that number and they just figured they'd use it for this since they couldn't use it for the interstate. I know I'm getting off topic, so I'll leave it at that. ChessEric 19:33, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]