Talk:Norman Matloff
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Editors of this article should please keep in mind WP:BLP and WP:NOT#SOAPBOX. All contentious statements about Norman Matloff absolutely must be backed by a credible source. This is not a place to attack him. -SpuriousQ (talk) 02:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC) What I want to know is why does he have a right to a wiki page? I think it should be that he doesnt deserve one. He hasnt really contributed much to the discussion via unbiased and scientifically accepted analysis. Why not just remove the page. Unless of course you think every professor in America who has appeared on a news network deserves a page.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.182.98.216 (talk) 00:29, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Globalization articles
- Low-importance Globalization articles