Talk:Nord Stage/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 09:19, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
" of Stockholm, Sweden. " perhaps "in ..."?
Done Changed to Stockholm in Sweden and wikilinked --Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Footnotes should be placed behind commas in "Reception" :)
Done Have done a few of these MOS fixes recently, and of course the last thing I did before the GA review would not have them. Anyway, fixed. :-) --Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Aye. Good work! :) Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 17:43, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pass/Fail: