Talk:Norah Head Light/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: intelati^talk 01:21, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Minor thing, the Light keepers section should be expanded or combined into another section

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   nice range of sources

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Understandable to the n00b

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   the only non free image can't be replaced, and adds to the value of the article

7. Overall: One thing above needs to be done, and then I will pass the article

   Pass/Fail:

I merged the light keepers section into the history section. --Muhandes (talk) 06:04, 21 November 2010 (UTC)