Talk:Non-relativistic spacetime

This page was proposed for deletion by Kudpung (talk · contribs) on 16 June 2017 with the comment:
Unsourced. Essay or WP:Original research
It was contested by JamesBWatson (talk · contribs) on 2017-06-16 with the comment:
Declining proposed deletion & adding a few references. These references are not ideal for the content of the article, but they are certainly enough to show that this is not "original research".

‹See TfM›

Physics: Relativity Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the relativity task force.

Old Prods

@JamesBWatson: When declining PRODs, or contesting them could you please add the template above ({{Old prod full}})? Thanks! (t) Josve05a (c) 23:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is Kaluza-Klein theory inconsistent?

"Kaluza–Klein theory was too beset with inconsistencies to be a viable theory."

Does this refer to KK+SM or just KK? According to Kaluza-Klein theory, KK+SM is probably inconsistent ("flounders on a number of issues"), but it makes no mention of KK (GR+EM) itself being inconsistent. Yodo9000 (talk) 18:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]