Talk:Non-canon

This article was nominated for deletion on July 3, 2006. The result of the discussion was Redirect to Canon (fiction).

I personally feel this page offers no more than a dicdef. I might list it for deletion soon. AdamBiswanger1 02:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, I did. I'm pretty much writing to myself. AdamBiswanger1 01:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Desire to return Non-canon

I understand that years ago, the article was deleted back in 2006. However, I recently ressurrected the article because I strongly feel that it is needed just as much as the canon article is. They are total opposites, and one can't be without the other. Alot of people are not even sure what the words "canon" and "non-canon" clearly mean. (LonerXL (talk) 18:02, 17 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

You should add the material to the canon (fiction) article first, and then split off in the future if need be. The material you added here did not pass the reliable source criteria.--Cúchullain ^t/c 19:11, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]