Talk:Noken system

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Indonesia Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Melanesia Low‑importance

	Oceania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Melanesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Melanesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MelanesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MelanesiaTemplate:WikiProject MelanesiaMelanesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Noken system appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 October 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the noken system used for voting in parts of Indonesia can produce turnouts of 100%?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Noken system.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Rjjiii talk 14:39, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the noken system used for voting in parts of Indonesia produces turnouts of 100%? Source: It is then not surprising if in several districts the turnout rates reached 100 percent on the fnal tally results (page 80)
- ALT1: ... that the Constitutional Court of Indonesia approved of the noken system of voting, despite it having no legal basis? Source: the Noken system, which is not provided for by any state laws or regulations,..what is significant from this case is not the court's approval of a fresh round of elections, but rather its acceptance of local (Papua) customs and practices in local elections (ie the Noken system)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Veto (card game)
- Comment: Other hook ideas welcome!

Created by Chipmunkdavis (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 48 past nominations.

CMD (talk) 20:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: I was wondering when this would be an article! Great work on it. New enough, long enough, sourced, neutral, plagiarism free. Hooks are cited and interesting. QPQ is complete. Per your invitation, I would like to suggest the following hook for consideration:

ALT2: ... the Constitutional Court of Indonesia ruled that the noken system is a valid method of electoral choice, reflecting customary practices and decreasing conflict? Ornithoptera (talk) 01:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
May be worth changing the end to "stating that it reflects customary practices and decreases conflict?" to make it clear that this is the view of the court and not a wikivoice statement. CMD (talk) 04:10, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]