Talk:Noah Syndergaard

Noah Syndergaard has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 1, 2022. (Reviewed version).

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Baseball: Angels / Dodgers / Mets / Phillies / Blue Jays Mid‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Los Angeles Dodgers (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York Mets (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Philadelphia Phillies (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto Blue Jays (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Semi-protected edit request on 4 June 2016

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

"Two hit two" be changed to "To hit two" -- spelling is incorrect 67.177.182.220 (talk) 02:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 07:18, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why is his team listed as the Mariners? 161.185.161.16 (talk) 19:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The page was vandalized. I fixed it. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Noah Syndergaard/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cherrell410 (talk · contribs) 01:29, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First Thoughts

Just glancing throughout the article, it looks like the article is well-sourced and has lots of information, including statistics, dates, and pictures. I'm already thinking that it will be a successful article.

Immediate failures

Passes all immediate failure criteria, making it further reviewable.

Criteria

I took all of the criteria listed from Wikipedia:Good article criteria.

Well Written

The prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience.
Spelling and grammar are correct, and it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

Verifiable with no original research

Contains a list of all references
All inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons.
It contains no original research.
It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.

Broad in its coverage

It addresses the main aspects of the topic.
It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.

Neutral

It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Stable

It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Illustrated

Media is tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
Media is relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Final Thoughts

I truly and deeply feel that this article meets all criteria and good article expectations, and deserves to be a good article.