Talk:No one likes us, we don't care

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Songs

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Stub?

Is this someones idea of a joke? 'Arry Boy (talk) 16:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perfectly serious question. Please have the common courtesy to reply. Thank you. 'Arry Boy (talk) 22:42, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Third time lucky, as they say. Will the person who rated this article as Stub Class, kindly exlplain their actions.? This article, in my opinion, cerainly needs to reassessed. Thank you. 'Arry Boy (talk) 13:28, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is now perfectly apparent, that there is only a very few people on this site, that have an understanding of common courtesy. If this article is a STUB why is it being mirrored and even "pinched" by other sites. If someone does not upgrade this article, I shall take it upon myself to do so. Thank you. 'Arry Boy (talk) 13:11, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The ratings system is nothing more than a mechanism to helps us prioritise which articles need work. It isn't intended as a system of judgement and really only provides a rough guide to article status. A bot running in the background summarises the information here. MRSC • Talk 10:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation. 'Arry Boy (talk) 13:49, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on No one likes us, we don't care. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090829153550/http://www.channel4.com:80/4car/ft/feature/feature/181/1 to http://www.channel4.com/4car/ft/feature/feature/181/1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]