Talk:No Way Out (1987 film)

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Australian / New Zealand / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Negative of a Polaroid?

The only major piece of forensic evidence in the case is the negative of a Polaroid

Is this what actually happens in the film? Because, Polaroid pictures don't have negatives. 207.31.229.4 13:56, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article about instant films explains their use of negatives. I have removed the reference to the Polaroid as inessential in a brief summary. — O'Dea (talk) 10:25, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Goofs

I fail to see how any of the 'goofs' are actually goofs. Heck, CNN makes typos to millions of people live all the time. I have no doubt the Pentagon could misspell a word. Lots42 23:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:NoWayOut3.jpg

Image:NoWayOut3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:No Way out.jpg

Image:No Way out.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the "too long & overly detailed analysis"

,it has allowed me to understand the plot twist in the end : it is not clear at all in the french version. As for the first 15 minutes of the film, the meeting and "coup de foudre" ("lightning stroke") between Susan & Tom, they are beautifully filmed & most impressive...T.y. Arapaima (talk) 07:00, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have shortened it a little. I think it's still too long, but that was the best I could do gramorak 12:13, 6 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gramorak (talk • contribs)

Brad Pitt

If it's uncredited and unconfirmed, it shouldn't be here, so I'm taking him out. Mingmingla (talk) 23:32, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He was an extra. He is clearly visible behind Kevin Costner on the left side of the screen as he walks into the big party. There are several clips of this on Youtube (I just checked because I didn't want to simply assume). This was before Growing Pains when he only did extra work. -- kainaw ™ 23:01, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citations have been added to confirm Pitt's role. — O'Dea (talk) 10:25, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

George R R Martin

That's totally him in it, isn't it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.18.34.59 (talk) 18:53, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]