Talk:No Pressure (film)/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 02:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 02:13, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Substantive review will be posted within 24 hours. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:16, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Lead: Short sentences need consolidating perhaps two paras for a short article such as this.

   A large number of short or single sentence paragraphs throughout the article need consolidation.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   One citation needed tag on the film's production needs addressing.

   References check out, no OR.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   sufficient detail.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   One image used with suitable non-free use rationale.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:12, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

   OK, good to go. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 11:56, 28 March 2011 (UTC)