Talk:No Podrás/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 04:53, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Only a few issues:

"It was released by Fonovisa Records as the lead single from his debut studio album Agua Nueva (1992)." → Since there are so many names listed in the first sentence, how about replacing "his" with "Castro's".

Done

Specify that the Billboard chart is in the US

Done

"His first role was on telenovela El Derecho de Nacer." → "His first role was on the telenovela El Derecho de Nacer."

Done

In the background section, it mentions ages a lot, but fails to mention any years. I think that's important information to have.

This one is a little hard to get since no source I could find have years. Erick (talk) 17:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The "Recording and composition" section really doesn't talk about the recording of the song, or its composition (expect for a little mention of who recorded the song). I, personally, title such sections "Music and lyrics".

Done

""No Podrás" was released on radio on July 1992..." → ""No Podrás" was serviced to radio in the United States on July 1992..."

Done

"...and debuted at number 39 on the Billboard Hot Latin Songs chart on the week of July 25, 1992." → "The single debuted at number 39 on the Billboard Hot Latin Songs chart on the week of July 25, 1992."

Done

"On the review of the compilation album..." → Whose compilation album is it?

Done

What makes refs 11 and 12 reliable?
- The site is an online Mexican retail store that sells promo single CDs and album promotions. Erick (talk) 17:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some additional copyediting to the article. And with that, I am confident in passing the article. Great work! — Statυs (talk, contribs) 19:12, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks! I honestly didn't think too much of the article to be honest. Erick (talk) 19:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.