Talk:No Mistakes/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DarklyShadows (talk · contribs) 23:16, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

I'm excited and honored to review your article. Just give me a bit to review it. DarklyShadows (talk) 23:16, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infoxbox and lead

• Looks good

Background

• "and he contributed" → "and contributed"
• "had previously featured" → "was previously featured"

•  Done for the above --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Compostion and lyrics

• Looks good

Release and promotion

• This could maybe be added to 'Background' because of how short it is.

•  Not done I understand it is short but four sentences can be its own section as long as that's not loads of separate sections, plus it deals with the subjects of both release and promotion --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Critical reception

• Looks good

Commercial performance and appearances in media

• "the song entered the US Billboard Hot 100 at number 36" → ""No Mistakes" debuted at number 36 on the US Billboard Hot 100"

•  Done --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

• "The song also debuted on the US Streaming Songs chart at number 17" → "The song also entered the US Streaming Songs, peaking at number 17"

•  Done with changes --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Credits and personnel

• Looks good

Charts

• Looks good

References

• Copyvio score looks good at 17.4%
• MOS:CAPS issue on Ref 9

•  Not done as that is how Jay-Z is stylized at times --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

External links

• Looks good

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold for now. This article looks good and is really well written! The comments shouldn't take long at all to address! DarklyShadows (talk) 02:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

• DarklyShadows Have responded and thanks for the review, able to pass now? --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Kyle Peake You did everything I asked and looks even better! So I’m going to ✓ Pass this nomination! DarklyShadows (talk) 09:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

DarklyShadows That's awesome, pleasure working with you on this! --Kyle Peake (talk) 09:16, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Kyle Peake It was my pleasure! You are not only a great reviewer, but also a great editor! I look forward to see what you do in the future! DarklyShadows (talk) 09:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)