Talk:No Me Queda Más/GA2
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: (CK)Lakeshade (talk · contribs) 01:34, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Multiple issues from the last GA nom have not been addressed.
- WP:LEAD: References should no be in the lead. [clarification needed] tag is still active.
- WP:OR throughout the article: Composition, Live performances, Track listing, Release history.
- Prose: Covers should be in prose, not chart, this is not a list. Critical reception and chart performance i could not even read through, there is no structure or flow. These should be two separate sections anyways.
- WP:NFCC issues: music video image fails, so does the sound sample.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- That tag was placed there by an unknown user. I am not sure why they tagged it because the sentence makes sense. But again I'll work on the article. Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 01:44, 7 October 2011 (UTC)