Jump to content

Talk:No Depression (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleNo Depression (album) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 17, 2008Good article nomineeListed
November 4, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 25, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Uncle Tupelo's 1990 album No Depression is so associated with alternative country that its title is sometimes used as a synonym for the genre?
Current status: Featured article

Requested move

[edit]

No Depression (album) → No Depression – Origin of the name, no need for two-item dab page. trialsanderrors 06:23, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We should reverse the move and let No Depression be the disambig. There are more than two items really. In the video series American Roots, Gillian Welch describes "No Depression music" or "Alternative country" as an American music whose name can be traced back to the Carter Family. Also, in a bonus disc available with some copies of The Devil You Know, Todd Snider has a conversation with Nanci Griffith where he says (something like), "What do you call what we do--No Depression music?". -MrFizyx 19:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Covered with No depression (disambiguation). I changed the headers. I never actually heard of the term "No Depression music", but if you want you can create a redirect to alternative country and add a dab header. ~ trialsanderrors 19:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose they just call it "No Depression", there is also some history with an AOL discussion board. The magazine was named for the AOL board, which was named for the UT album which was named after the Carter Family song... You can read about it a few places.[1][2] I would have left the main namespace as the disambig, and the album where it was, but I suppose what you've done works for now. -MrFizyx 20:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I just added the lineage to the No Depression (periodical) article. I'll add your source too. ~ trialsanderrors 20:20, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This move still bothers me. I'd like to see it reversed. "No Depression" really should be the disambiguation page. (1) The album didn't come first, the song did. (2) In many ways I think the magazine over time became better known for the album. -MrFizyx (talk) 05:33, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've started doing the legwork on this. It will take some time to get accurate results from "what links here" since many pages were linked via the Uncle Tupelo template. Many pages that link to "No Depression" are actually intended to indicate the magazine not the UT album. -MrFizyx (talk) 06:16, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:UTND.jpg

[edit]

Image:UTND.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:No Depression (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    Well done.
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    I have gone off and passed the article to GA, as I did not find anything troubling while reading the article. Congratulations on everyone for their hard effort.

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Two Disc Legacy Edition

[edit]

No Depression has now been reissued as a two disc "Legacy Edition." http://pitchfork.com/news/53010-uncle-tupelos-no-depression-gets-two-disc-deluxe-reissue/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.96.174.61 (talk) 20:41, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on No Depression (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on No Depression (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:No_Depression_(album)&oldid=1211289790"