Jump to content

Talk:No Can Do

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNo Can Do has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 20, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:No Can Do/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 19:04, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


Infobox

[edit]
  • If Soul is an influence and not stated by a critic, then only Pop should be there.
    • Done; added a source in the body. Till

Lead

[edit]
  • "No Can Do" received generally mixed reviews → "No Can Do" garnered mixed reviews
  • from music critics, as some felt that the song was dull, but most agreed that it was an improvement from their previous single "Girls". → from music critics; some felt that the song was dull, but others agreed that it was better than their previous single, "Girls"
  • it also appeared on the chart in Slovakia. → it also charted on the singles chart in Slovakia at number 53.
  • Link music video
  • Mention only live performance?

Background

[edit]
  • (2007), and the completion of the album's → (2007) and finishing its supporting tour,
  • Despite their announcement, they soon began work on the album. → Source?
    • Done; added source. Till
  • I'd change the title of this section to "Background and release"
  • Perhaps say what the extended play consists of?

Composition

[edit]
  • For the audio sample, is 38 seconds 10% of 3:10?
    • No it's 20% but in my defense I didn't upload it (don't know how to). Till
  • How can you use the album notes for genres?
  • The single release has a length of 3:10 (three minutes and ten seconds). → This implies that the album version is different in some way?
  • According to the digital sheet music published at Sheet Music Direct by Sony-ATV Music Publishing and EMI Music Publishing, → Not needed.
  • "No Can Do" samples the song "Yes It's You", performed by Tennessee artist Sweet Charles Sherrell. → Sherrel was a bassist, not a singer, and helped produce songs for James Brown, so how does it sample something of his?
  • As you have included info about Keisha explaining the lyrics, I'd change the title of the this section "Composition and lyrics"

Critical reception

[edit]

Commercial performance

[edit]
  • Why don't you use the Official Charts Company website archive for the peak instead of Musicweek? You can't get much more reliable than the Official Charts Company website.
  • brought their total single sales to three million. → Is this over their entire career?
    • Yeah but as of now it's like 4 million. Till
  • "No Can Do" failed to chart on the Irish Singles Chart, becoming the group's first single since "Soul Sound" to not chart in that country. → No source, so remove.
  • Why not mention the European chart?

Music video

[edit]

Live performances

[edit]
  • No issues.

Track listings

[edit]
  • I'd change this to "Formats and track listings"

Credits and personnel

[edit]
  • Vanessa Brown died in 1999, how is she credited?
    • Wrong Vanessa Brown LOL. Fixed. Till

Charts

[edit]
  • No issues.

Release history

[edit]
  • No issues.

References

[edit]
  • I went through and corrected any that were erroneous.
  • You need to to change every reference to the date format: Day/Month/Year, for example 1 January 2000 (No comma). This article is about a British group, and is written in British English, so the dates should be written in British English.
    • Is this necessary? I mean people will know the date. All their articles follow the 2000-01-01 format. Till
  • Sheetmusicdirect link doesn't go to anything. Why not use Musicnotes.com ?