Talk:No. 91 Wing RAAF/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jonas Vinther (talk · contribs) 22:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
I'll review this one first thing tomorrow, Ian. :) Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 22:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
- I'm sorry Ian about the two-day delay - family stuff got in the way, but I'll review it now. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 23:25, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Is it well-written?
- 1. Lead could use some paragraphs.
- 2. I feel File:No. 91 Wing RAAF officers 1950 (AWM P01254.127).JPG has a waaaay to long caption. Might consider shorting it a bit.
- 3. The D in "development" used in reference #8 should be capitalized so as to match reference #45.
- Other than these three minor points, I don't see anything wrong with it. Excellent job.
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- Is it neutral?
- Is it stable?
- Is it illustrated?
- The article meets the GA-criteria for sure, but would like response to those three, minor points I highlighted, so I'm going to put it on hold. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 23:25, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Jonas, I've acted on your three suggestions -- and tks for your kind words. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2014 (UTC)