Talk:No. 33 Squadron RAAF

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the No. 33 Squadron RAAF article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

No. 33 Squadron RAAF is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 15, 2019.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 1, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
July 28, 2013	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
November 25, 2013	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured article

Military history: Aviation / South Pacific / World War II / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Australia: Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal No. 33 Squadron RAAF is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Foreign Flights

Ian, if the first RAAF flight to Russia is worth mentioning, so then is the first RAAF flight to China preceding it.Lexysexy (talk) 07:34, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say yes, but unfortunately I didn't see any mention of it in my sources -- do you have a ref? I saw your edit re. 33FLT; one of my sources stated it was under 37SQN but a couple of others make no mention of it so I won't argue about it -- I guess it would be interesting having two WGCDRs in the same squadron... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 07:46, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, I need to add "since the revolution", because, of course. 38 SQN went there in 1946. The dates were: 4-6 Aug 1982, PM Fraser to Beijing, A20-627, but my source is unpublished <g>. I'll see whether I can find a reputable newspaper report.Lexysexy (talk) 09:27, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:No. 33 Squadron RAAF/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Retrolord (talk · contribs) 13:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to review this ★★Retro Lord ★★ 13:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tks for reviewing! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 15:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A few points:

Why does the articles infobox only mention the A330? Has the squadron ever flown other aircraft in the past? ★★Retro Lord ★★ 14:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, but I generally prefer to leave discussion of previous aircraft in the text as mentioning types in the infobox may give the impression it's an exhaustive list, and that's rarely possible to confirm as different sources can give contradictory information, not simply on exactly when the unit operated the types, but the types themselves. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 15:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Who is the commander of the squadron? ★★Retro Lord ★★ 14:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know -- the RAAF website rarely provides this information regarding its units. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 15:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
How many people are currently assigned to this squadron? ★★Retro Lord ★★ 14:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Ditto. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 15:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, ★★Retro Lord ★★ 14:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not really sure what more I can do in this review, the article seems perfectly OK. I expect i'll pass it over the coming days provided nothing else jumps out at me. Thanks, ★★Retro Lord ★★ 19:29, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	"fell through" Seems a bit colloquial? Could you rewrite? Agree -- done. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 02:14, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply] " personages" That seems a bit tooooo formal. Could you rewrite? Agree -- done. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 02:14, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply] "Omega Air" Can we bluelink this? Linked as Omega Air Services in second-last paragraph. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 02:14, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

Ongoing Nitpicking

Ian, the 707s were actually rigged for 183 seats, all economy. I think the Roylance figures relate to a two-class set-up.Lexysexy (talk) 23:33, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, actually it's Air Force Today (from the mid-90s) that mentioned 160, Roylance didn't say. To be honest I don't mind dropping the figure as we say later on that one of them flew 300 troops in two sorties, which gives a good approximation of its capacity anyway -- the main thing with the recent addition was to reiterate that they carried cargo and 'regular' passengers as well as VIPs. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 10:24, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Two extra aircraft

@Ian Rose: I'm not sure where to best work it into this article so I'll leave it to you, but the government has ordered an extra two KC-30s: [1] [2] (interestingly, they're ex-Qantas aircraft). 05:57, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Tks mate. Ex-Qantas, eh? Keeping it in the family... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 10:50, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on No. 33 Squadron RAAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120530233931/http://airpower.airforce.gov.au/publications/Details/431/From-Controversy-to-Cutting-Edge.aspx to http://airpower.airforce.gov.au/Publications/Details/431/From-Controversy-to-Cutting-Edge.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on No. 33 Squadron RAAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514101526/http://www.defence.gov.au/news/raafnews/EDITIONS/4702/topstories/story12.htm to http://www.defence.gov.au/news/raafnews/EDITIONS/4702/topstories/story12.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:22, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on No. 33 Squadron RAAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on No. 33 Squadron RAAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:51, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on No. 33 Squadron RAAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140214082333/http://www.defence.gov.au/health/infocentre/journals/ADFHJ_apr04/ADFHealth_5_1_bc.pdf to http://www.defence.gov.au/health/infocentre/journals/ADFHJ_apr04/ADFHealth_5_1_bc.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on No. 33 Squadron RAAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]