Jump to content

Talk:No. 1 Squadron RAAF

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleNo. 1 Squadron RAAF is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starNo. 1 Squadron RAAF is part of the No. 90 (Composite) Wing RAAF series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 12, 2015.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 8, 2014Good article nomineeListed
May 20, 2014WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
November 1, 2014Featured article candidatePromoted
December 18, 2014Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Graphic labeled - 'Airco DH.9a at RAAF Point Cook, c. 1926'

[edit]

The aircraft pictured appears to be an SE-5a.

http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=SE-5a&go=Submit+Query&qs=bs&form=QBIR — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.68.47.103 (talk) 01:31, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • It would appear that the aircraft in question in the article is identified incorrectly. I assume this is from the AWM description being incorrect. The aircraft appears to be a SE-5a. Ian if your patrolling can you confirm and update. Regards Newm30 (talk) 05:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Gah, yes -- the noses are similar but the second set of struts on a DH.9 give it away! Will email AWM about it but in the meantime have uploaded another shot. Tks guys! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:36, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Citation style

[edit]

I suggest we change to {{sfn}} style for referencing as it links between short footnotes and citations for a better user experience. 04:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

One day we will probably adopt a standard style for references (personally I really hope it is NOT {{sfn}}) but of course which of the various styles currently used for different articles we end up making out "standard" will not be up to either you or me! In the meantime, changing citation styles on individual articles (except perhaps to make them consistent within that article) is a patent waste of time and energy and must be strongly deprecated. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 04:35, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on No. 1 Squadron RAAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:58, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on No. 1 Squadron RAAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on No. 1 Squadron RAAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:29, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on No. 1 Squadron RAAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:No._1_Squadron_RAAF&oldid=1204883687"