Jump to content

Talk:No. 1 Operational Training Unit RAAF/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AustralianRupert (talk · contribs) 10:54, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments
  • The article is well referenced, well written and the images seem appropriately licenced.
  • There are no dabs. External links work. No duplicate links. Images have alt text.
  • The Earwig tool reports no copyright violations.
  • Beyond these points, I have a few minor comments/suggestions:
  • the "RAAF" and "No. 1 OTU" abbreviations are introduced both in the lead and the first paragraph of the History section, which is probably unnecessary;
  • in the lead, "Formed in December 1941 at Nhill, Victoria" --> perhaps this should be "Formed in December 1941 at RAAF Station Nhill..." for consistency with the way the other locations are presented?
  • " After their preliminary training, pilots went through a six-week conversion to Lockheed Hudsons and Bristol Beauforts..." On what types were they trained before converting?
  • The source for "preliminary training" implies it's ground-based or theoretical training, though it's not explicit. Would changing to "preliminary instruction" or "initial training" help at all? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 00:28, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually, now I read it again, it is probably okay as is. I was displaying my lack of understanding and thought that conversion meant they had previously been trained on other aircraft, but of course that would have been prior to arriving at the unit. AustralianRupert (talk) 02:09, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]