Talk:No-budget film
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I removed H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds by Timothy Hines since, in the article, it cited the film as being made for $50,000.00. As most films mentioned here were made for around $1.000.00, perhaps H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds belongs in the low-budget. rather than no budget category. YourInvisibleFriend 00:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
The Blair Witch Project is hardly a "no budget film". The director was allowed $30,000 for filming it initially and by the time it hit cinemas it had cost over $500,000. Enkidu6 (talk) 10:56, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Colin (zombie film)
[edit]Should Colin be added to the list? The fact that it was made for around £50 seems to be something noteworthy to the film (it's in its IMDb trivia, and I remember when it was being marketed interviews would always make mention of the budget) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.199.220 (talk) 19:58, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
New addition
[edit]Is there some special reason we should include Saptaswa Basu? The citation does not use the phrase "no budget film" anywhere, and the addition was quite promotional. I don't think he needs to be listed here. This article was nothing but an example farm until I pruned it down, and it's already starting to turn back into one now. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:37, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with NinjaRobotPirate that the edits by NeoSurya (talk · contribs) seem to violation WP:PROMO and WP:ADVERT. — Cirt (talk) 17:35, 17 November 2014 (UTC)