Talk:Nixon Moreno
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
[edit]I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:04, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Article overhauled and reorganized, more work to be done.
[edit]Nearly all of the info under "Political points of view" pertained to the rape accusations. I've moved this info to its own section. The political points of view section sits basically empty now, and could benefit from expansion by someone who is familiar with Moreno's politics. I also did a lot of grammar and POV cleanup. I believe that as the article stands now, it's appropriate to remove the weasel and peacock templates, which I've done. If you disagree with this decision, please give an explanation here and I'll try to clean up the POV further. I also added a refimprove template. This article contained many phrases that could be considered contentious, which I removed, but there are still issues with lack of sourcing. Discussion of the rape accusations in particular are problematic when unsourced, as unverifiable statements regarding the case are present in the article.
Thanks for reading! Skeletor3000 (talk) 20:19, 12 November 2019 (UTC)