Talk:Nirma University

India: Gujarat / Education Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Gujarat (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Education in India workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

On what basis can you say that this is one of the top universities in India? Please cite an authority...

Comment

Really really NIRMA University is the amongst the best Universities of India or even in ASIA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.210.180 (talk) 10:53, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vision and Mission is promotional chaff

I propose that the Vision and Mission sections are deleted. They are unencyclopaedic promotional text, of little possible interest to the layman reader and will continue to suffer with a lack of independent quality sources to give them any context. Fæ (talk) 12:54, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion

I am placing a db-g11 tag on this page for speedy deletion. This article needs to be completely rewritten. This page seems to have quickly deteriorated into an advert after its creation in 2006 (see the revision history). The author of this article is retired, and the main (seemingly) contributor does not have a user account. If you feel like this article needs to be preserved and revamped, use the hang on tag. But explain your reasoning in the talk page for doing so.--Tt801 (talk) 18:45, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the speedy as I don't think the article is spammy enough to warrant deletion. Yes some sections are a bit too spammy but I believe it would be easy to remove those sections and do a little re-writing rather than start to scratch. As a last-stop method the article could always be reverted to an older version. Feel free to take to WP:AfD of you desire. Also asking people to use hangon rather than remove the tag is against our deletion policy - anyone but the page creator can remove a speedy tag they disagree with. Dpmuk (talk) 12:08, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Dr Karsanbhai K Patel- President, Nirma University.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:23, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]