Talk:Ninki Nanka

Africa: Gambia Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	The Gambia portal This article is supported by WikiProject Gambia (assessed as Low-importance).

Folklore Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This page is useles. One BBC article as a source? Seeing as the Burrunjor page was deleted, and it had far more sources, this article should been deleted swiftly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.73.78.45 (talk) 21:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. it has a reletaivly large amount of information for a lesser known cryptid. and it has an dinosaur like discription, a feaure commen to many cryptids in that area. I suggest that it be moved into a list of simaler, dinosaur like, lesser knwon cryptids of the african jungle. 71.75.237.194 (talk) 00:45, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~ Too add to what your saying not only does it have a large amount of information but the expedition found out that everything we though about the creature was wrong and that it can be found in numerous books which they didn't give any names of with other unknown animals in it and the park rangers wouldn't even take them into the area of were the creature was reported too live so much more needs to be found out on this creature. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.100.52 (talk) 00:03, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]