This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
My deletion of the following section was reverted:
The Democratic Left continued through the 1990s, becoming more and more obviously pro-New Labour in its political tone. This is perhaps best symbolised by the promotion of so-called 'syntegrity' as a mode for running political meetings.
To one member - and perhaps many other members - of Democratic Left, this was the straw which broke the camel's back, especially after Nina Temple increasingly stressed an affiliation to the ideas of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe in this context. This member, Brian Precious, thought that this amounted to a trivialization and misrepresentation of the ideas of the latter, and so he organised a meeting featuring Laclau and Hilary Wainwright in November 1996, at which the ideas of Ernesto and Chantal were placed in a much better context, without seeming to give any credence to the obviously opportunistic posturing of so many New Labour politicians.
Let me explain again my objections to this section.
(1) It is biased, as shown by the way in which "syntegrity" is discussed", and also in the tendentious phraseology ("placed in a much better context", "opportunistic posturing").
(2) It appears to elevate a single member of the organisation who is not well known and is of no importance. In effect the views of a single member, Brian Precious, are given two paragraphs in a relatively short article - is he a substantial enough figure to merit that? It seems not. 09:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)86.146.228.185 (talk) 09:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
