Talk:Nina Agadzhanova

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Russia: History

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.

Soviet Union

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kaityzoz. Peer reviewers: Carrot47, Gari.olsson, TurinHorse2011, Ef674.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Hello, I really enjoy reading your article. I feel like I know much more about Nina in a clear and detailed way. I particulary enjoy the way you analyze and present her relationships to Eisenstein. Your point of view was fair and objective. I find the organisation of the page quite adequate. I am guessing you didn't find any information concerning her childhood ? or even before 1917 ? I reckon that if even her birth date seems unknown, it must be inexistent. But I kind of missed those kind of informations, especially because I feel like it would be interesting to know in which kind of environnement she grew up to be so involved in political actions...

My last comment would be on the language - I understand the struggle, english not being my first language - but with such a well-done research, I feel some sentences corrections could really enhance your good work. Some examples of sentences : "She is perhaps most widely recognized for writing" - cut the perhaps ? ; "She engaged in work" "she also functioned as" not sure how to phrase that though... (I can list them if you want/need it)

Also I would point out one repetition that would not be necessay in "While Eisenstein was a child during the events of 1905, Agadzhanova, ten years his senior, had participated in uprisings in Ekaterinodar as a teenager and joined the Bolsheviks in 1907" I would cut that last part, probably because we know that already at this point.

Small details as you can see... I really enjoy reading it ! Well done — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gari.olsson (talk • contribs) 22:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review 2

This review made me hyper-aware of how much work I need to do on mine. It was thorough, compelling and included all types of salient information that made continuing to read it easy and enjoyable. My only suggestion is that you include a little bit of information about her death, if possible. Oh and maybe a little more information about what she was specifically doing during the revolution though that might not be as relevant, I'm just fascinated with the subject matter. TurinHorse2011 (talk) 22:01, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review 3

Hi! I just finished reading your article and I have to say it is fantastic. All of your information is clear, detailed and presented in a very organized way. As I was reading I was trying to find something to critique and it kind of seems impossible. Since I have to say at least one thing, I would suggest maybe to add links into the information box with her picture. Other than that, I really think this was a great article and you did a great job! And you also made me aware of how much work I need to add to my own.

Carrot47 (talk) 18:23, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review 4

Very strong article which covers what she did out of film and, without telling us directly, infers that both her screenwriting work and activism were inform by the same positions. I think my only comment is that you should format the filmography in the table in a way which is 'cleaner,' adding capitals at the start of works and perhaps adding the ability to "sort" the filmography by dates/role/etc. Its too bad there are a lot of dead links with the article (red links), I don't know if you could remedy this by adding external links. And one last thing, your citations are kinda clumped up at the end of paragraphs, I'd try to make it more precise and therefore, easy to track. Good job!

Ef674 (talk) 17:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]