Talk:Nimona/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 10:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Observations
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
Prose is excellent, follows MOS for writing and references. Deals with a work of fiction that has gone from Webcomic to Audible to Film.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
Good work in linking to archived reliable sources.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
The text remains on topic and is focussed.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
84,655 page views in the last three months. / 130 editors for 301 edits to page. / Nominator is third most industrious editor.
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
is a book cover (for print edition), suitably sized, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Rationale accepted.
- Overall:
This is a review in progress: --Whiteguru (talk) 07:27, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Article is well laid out. Cancellation of film version - a massive disappointment - is an important inclusion. Good work on references, particularly archived references. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:58, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Yay! This is really great to hear. But, yeah @Whiteguru, the cancellation of the film is definitely a massive disappointment. Disney should have never shut down Blue Sky Studios... I sadly don't think the film will ever see the light of day. Historyday01 (talk) 12:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)