Talk:Nimbus Rooftop Bar

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 February 2022. The result of the discussion was redirect.

Australia

Nimbus Rooftop Bar is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles

More information:
/
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this redirect.

Food and drink: Bartending / Foodservice

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Related taskforces:
/
	This redirect is within the scope of the Bartending Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.
	This redirect is supported by the Foodservice task force.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Notability

Per a request for a third opinion, ill lay out my thoughts on this topic's notability. This article is clearly governed by Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) which states "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability." So lets look at this articles citations. Bonewah (talk) 15:35, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So i count 5 sources here:

Australian Business Register.
Bendigo Advertiser
Escape
Broadsheet
The New Daily.

Notability of orgs and companies, examples of trivial coverage tells us a source is trivial (and, therefore does not help establish notability) if it is "standard notices, brief announcements, and routine coverage". The Australian Business Register is clearly that as it is simply a notice that the business registered.

Further examples of trivial coverage include "inclusion in lists of similar organizations, particularly in "best of", "top 100", "fastest growing" or similar lists" which i think the new Daily reference is. Bonewah (talk) 15:45, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Worth noting WP:AUD says " Evidence of significant coverage by international or national, or at least regional, media is a strong indication of notability. On the other hand, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability; at least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary." Bonewah (talk) 15:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The escape reference looks to also be a 'top 10 list' and both 'Escape' and 'The New Daily seem to be WP:RESTAURANTREVIEWS which advises that reviews that are "brief and routine reviews do not qualify" as establishing notability. Bonewah (talk) 16:11, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

'Broadsheet also looks like a restaurant review, but might be a bit more than 'brief or routine'. I cant view the full text of either of the 'Bendigo Advertiser' citations so i cant really judge them, except to note that the "Bendigo Advertiser" appears to be a local paper (which doesnt disqualify it as a source).

So based on what ive seen, i would argue that this subject is not notable per Wikipedia guidelines as the bulk of the sources cited are routine reviews and do not cover the subject in depth. I could be convinced otherwise but it would take more than another restaurant review/top X list/travel note, etc. Bonewah (talk) 16:20, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you User:Bonewah for all of your efforts on this and for your objective assessment of the notability of Nimbus Rooftop Bar. Jamesmcardle^(talk) 00:35, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]