Talk:Nilotpal Mrinal

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge of Draft:Nilotpal Mrinal into Nilotpal Mrinal

Draft contains more detail than article. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:43, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

any updates Anuragpathak12d (talk) 15:34, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merging the Article

Nilotpal Mrinal page is already exists in wikipedia which is great for me but as the text written in it is very short. I have written everything in detail as I represent the person mentioned in the article. So Draft Nilotpal Mrinal should be merged as soon as possible or else I would not mind to edit the existing article. Thank you Anuragpathak12d (talk) 17:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You represent him? Have you declared this conflict of interest anywhere? You should not be editing the article directly. Wikignome Wintergreen^talk 23:54, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikignome Wintergreen:. I have posted {{uw-paid1}} to the editor's talk page. We'll see.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:35, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fuhghettaboutit: Uh, I also found copyright violations, specifically copy/pastes from this article. I've removed them. If a revdel is necessary, I guess my sandbox needs to be included? I copied the article there to work on it before realizing the problem... Wikignome Wintergreen^talk 01:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fuhghettaboutit: I noticed that the above account is still editing this article and hasn't made any COI disclosures. Wikignome Wintergreen^talk 18:03, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikignome Wintergreen:. Thanks for the heads up! I've left a third level warning at the user's talk page ({{uw-paid3}} – yes, that's referring to you Anuragpathak12d; please comply now. It's not hard. The prior notice on your talk page, that you seem to have ignored entirely, contains spoonfed instructions about how to do so; not sure why successive notices are necessary when compliance should take about one minute of effort, and is your obligation without any prompting. I will block your account if I find you make a single edit to this article or about this subject without doing so first).

Btw, looking at the article, some additional text had some hallmarks of copying, and upon a search, I found another apparent copy-paste. Unfortunately, on this one, I couldn't check for backwards copying. This could be a mirror of the page; hard to tell without viewing the content there in context; but I got a warning from my browser when I attempted to visit the site about a potential security risk of proceeding (so I didn't). When there's a history of past infringements, this risk is run; the burden shifts to assuming copyvios, rather than needing affirmative evidence of it before acting.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:20, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What do you need actually? Yes I represent him in social media I have excess of all his social media accounts.As far as writing on wikipedia concern I am giving you clarification that it is unpaid and I do agree it might contains some copied articles but most of the articles were written by me or our team in the past on other places. I am not getting your points. Please let me know what actually it needs to proof. Anuragpathak12d (talk) 17:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fuhghettaboutit: I'm just pinging to make sure the above post gets seen by its intended recipient, let's see if I can do this right... Wikignome Wintergreen^talk 00:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Anuragpathak12d: See your talk page, again. The notice there gives detailed instructions for compliance with WP:PAID, and it's not even difficult. You say you are unpaid. I'm 99% sure that's wrong based on what you've disclosed. Any sort of financial connection, broadly construed. Or is he your client out of the goodness of your heart? You would need to be much more specific. Meanwhile, you cannot post copyrighted content here, even if you wrote it, unless you obtained a suitable release, with proper formalities. I don't think doing so would be a good use of your time. We care little about what someone wants to say about themselves, and most of such material is highly unsuitable as written.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok now when you have corrected all those copied articles. what you need by my side? I declare, I shall be more careful while writing future articles. Anuragpathak12d (talk) 17:27, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]