This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2021. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
A fact from Nilima Arun Kshirsagar appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 July 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Can we find a source for "to Vishnu and Kusum Bapat in Mumbai. After graduated as MBBS in 1971 she became a Doctor of Medicine in 1974 and a PhD in 1987 from Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College (KEM), Mumbai. On December 25, 1972 she married Arun Narayan Kshirsagar.[citation needed]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Copyvio removed, neutrality issues are fixed, notability of colleague which I was originally concerned was puffery has been confirmed (apologies for stating it as such), year of birth is confirmed - I was bold and removed her full birthday as there is still no reliable source provided, BLP issues around personal life are now resolved, a thorough copyedit has been done (many thanks Victuallers). Lead looks fine now. I made some tiny copyedits to assist. Overall, she is indeed an article on an important Indian research scientist. Aussie Article Writer (talk) 17:25, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I think this article is worth reconsideration for DYK. It is still in the list of nominations and I have spent some time addressing the points that @Aussie Article Writer: identified. I'm sure its not perfect, but I think it is up to DYK standard. I would like to encourage @Sachinvenga: to look at the edits I've made and check I have no misrepresented the Prof.... then maybe another editor can recheck this for DYK. This is a notable Prof and the "suspicious" researcher turns out to be a dead prof who did in fact make huge contributions. So? can we reconsider? Victuallers (talk) 16:45, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Aussie Article Writer, it is the last-listed icon in the review that determines what the bot thinks in terms of whether the article has passed, and the lowest of the icons is the slash, not the tick. If the article does pass at the moment, please insert a tick in a comment below this one to confirm that fact. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:41, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]