Talk:Nikon D800

Tags

Disagree with Not Appropriate and Single Source tags. 212.60.42.111 (talk) 23:25, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

They'll probably be removed in the next few hours. The D800 is being officially announced as we speak—in fact, Nikon Brazil has already issued a press release that's made it (in translated form) to any number of English-language sites. We should get the official word from other Nikon subsidiaries any moment now. — Dale Arnett (talk) 02:31, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

• Update: Turns out that wasn't from Nikon Brazil. It was apparently Nikon's official Japanese press release, translated into Portuguese and posted on a Brazilian site. — Dale Arnett (talk) 03:50, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Pre-release rumors/development

Paragraph starting:

"The camera was rumored..."

The speculation regarding the delayed release of the camera aren't very relevant now that it's been announced officially. Should that entire section be removed? Filemeaway (talk) 09:21, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:NikonD800Purchase.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:NikonD800Purchase.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:NikonD800Purchase.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:29, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Rear screen: dots or pixels?

There is sthg wrong about pixels or dots in the rear screen description in the right column. 921K dots are 921K pixels, I dont see how it can be equivalent to 307K pixels as written By the way, Nikon always talk about pixels for their rear screen. I think we should delete this conversion in pixels. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charliecorgan (talk • contribs) 12:40, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Weather sealing could use more detail

Magnesium alloy weather-sealed body comparable to D700, but considered less robust than D4.

Umm, okay. The D700 article says exactly zilch.