This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
For any logical and consisten usage, terms in categories need to have a unified meaning. The Russian Empire was not the same state as the current Russia, outside of the mind of Putin, and in the Russian Empire a large number of subjects would not have ever identified under the denonym "Russian". In the same way that despite what Erdogan believes, the Ottoman Empire and Turkey are not the same, and we do not use Turkish as a category to identify the subjects of the Ottoman Empire, we should not use "Russian" to identify the subjects of the Russian Empire.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:55, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If you just care to read anything on Russian or world history, you'll find out that the term "Russian" was used long before Putin, Yeltsin or the Russian Federation ever existed. Just like the term "British", not "Imperial British" hasb een used for centuries. Only the Soviet period introduced the "Soviet" term, and that one has long gone. The clasification you are using is original research and need to be well-sourced and discussed. But to add to confusion, you creat subcategories like "Russian Empire military doctors" in the "Military physicians by nationality" categories. AveTory (talk) 02:07, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and as for Burdenko and Pirogov, both of them identified themselves as "Russians" and "Russian surgeons" in their works and public speeches, not to mention they were both Russians by origin and by birth. AveTory (talk) 02:19, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion