Talk:Nikkō Shōnin

Buddhism Mid‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Japan: Biography / Religion C‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 14:57, November 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

C

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Biography task force.

This article is supported by the Religion task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Dai-Gohonzon

I removed the part saying Nikko protected the Dai-Gohonzon. There was no citation given, it was written as fact, and the Dai-Gohonzon is disputed. Steve (talk) 21:17, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some info on Nikko's early life, and broken the article down into sections. Steve (talk) 21:17, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nikko Shonin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160101091859/http://nichirenscoffeehouse.net/Ryuei/NichirensBio.html to http://nichirenscoffeehouse.net/Ryuei/NichirensBio.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:19, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Article is biased

This article is heavely if not completely biased by Nichiren Shoshu views. It is important to note that Nikko is not the founder of Nichiren Shoshu only but also of two other separate schools of Nichiren Buddhism and of the Nikko linages within Nichiren Shu. The whole article should be rewritten to be more objective and accurate towards historical facts. Gonzalopena25 (talk) 04:01, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There aren't a lot of people working on these articles, and there are some obvious problems with lack of expertise and non-native English with the existing texts. Perhaps there is less of a problem with bias than there is with just a lack of people volunteering to do this work. PeepleLikeYou (talk) 23:45, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why omit the kanji for shonin?

In the text the title 上人 is omitted from the Japanese text for some reason, won't this confuse people? PeepleLikeYou (talk) 12:32, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Nikko Shonin.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please at least write correct English

Regarding this edit conflict:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikk%C5%8D_Sh%C5%8Dnin&curid=526131&diff=925932705&oldid=925903284

I don't offer an opinion on which version is better factually, but could you please at least write correct English?

Thanks. PeepleLikeYou (talk) 23:51, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody else seems to care about this so I've reverted to the last version to be written in grammatical English. PeepleLikeYou (talk) 13:33, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]