Jump to content

Talk:Night Attack (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Duplicate info

[edit]

The same album is at Night Attack (album). Most of the info is on both. These pages should be merged. Sampm 09:52, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I support this idea, I have just added the content from the international version to the base Australian version article, then I added new content and supported some of the added material with references: more needs to be done.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 13:03, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Night Attack (album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Start class:
  • Green tickY A reasonably complete infobox
  • Green tickY A lead section giving an overview of the album
  • Green tickY A track listing
  • Green tickY Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient)
  • Green tickY Categorisation at least by artist and year

C class:

  • Green tickY All the start class criteria
  • Green tickY A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
  • Green tickY At least one other section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
  • Green tickY A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
  • Green tickY A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.
  • Red XN Independent in-line references supporting major/controversial claims

B class:

  • Red XN All the C class criteria
  • Green tickY A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
  • Green tickY A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
  • Red XN No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
  • Green tickY No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS.
    Self-assessed and hence may be biased. I'm not entirely happy with all claims in the article, but will leave that for another editor. It could become C-class (or even B-class) with more in the Lead section and those references added.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 13:01, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 16:46, 17 August 2013 (UTC). Substituted at 01:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Night Attack (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]