Talk:Nigel Nicolson

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Was Nigel Nicolson bisexual? --Francis Burdett 15:31, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have no reason to think so, and was shocked today upon my first visit to this page to find him so-categorized. He famously wrote about his bi-sexual parents; I know of no reason to think him bisexual himself and am thus removing the link to "bisexual writers". If and only if someone can provide proper documentation should this categorization be restored. I am astonished that apparently it has been in place here for more than a year in the absence of any explanation at all. SocJan 10:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]