This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
I agree with WP:BLPNAME, but it should not apply in this instance. The names are on his official bio at his work place, i.e. means not third party and not media. There is a reason WP:BLPNAME repeatedly talks about third party, as in the subject may not have wanted that information out in the world, but here when you have a primary source that would have been provided by the subject, they had a chance to keep the information private, yet chose not to, which also applies to the under 18 bit. And if you look at the examples, they are all talking about negative items, not just a bare mention of the names. But, at the very least, please restore a son and a daughter, and always "Where names are redacted, editors are encouraged to explain why on the article's talk page". Which is here. Aboutmovies (talk) 18:18, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The BLPNAME policy applies to this article for for three reasons:
There is no significant value added to the article by including the names
They are not significantly notable enough for their own Wikipedia articles
They are minors
Regardless of where Nigel Burton has chosen to list the names of his children/family members, there is no reason that they should be included in this article, and as such should be removed per BLP policy. That being said, I don't believe there is an issue with regard to adding the daughter/son information. Jezebel'sPonyoshhh18:43, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
We could argue about whether a website bio is or isn't technically "the media," but since it's so tangential to the article, we should err on the side of caution. The names should definitely be left out, and I would even leave out the gender, following the general guideline that minor children "deserve greater protection from intrusions upon their privacy." --Esprqii (talk) 19:12, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
