Talk:Nigamananda Saraswati

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Help To Add Infobox

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help add the person infobox. TacitusIndicus (talk) 05:20, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done, feel free to fill it out as best you can.

^Avic _ennasis @ 11:00, 9 Elul 5771 / 11:00, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest to add an image in the infobox. And BTW, I have placed this thread in a section! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message)

The sympathizer of Nigmanand Saraswati made a specific wild and baseless complaint on the name of Professor T D Dogra when medical board of experts was being constituted and in progress to give opinion,now repeatedly some one is removing his name from this biographical article, it is unfair, the sympathizer have all the rights to put up their views but they should be honest enough to state the truth so that any one having a question or re-investigating can contact otherwise it will be one sided biased story , hence do not hide the facts...... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.161.208.174 (talk) 07:56, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 17:39, 23 October 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Nigamanand → Nigamananda Saraswati
Nigamananda → Nigamananda Paramahansa

– This is going to be a dificult move. Let me try to explain. There are at least two different Nigamananda in house.

We had already the tile Nigamananda reserved for Nigamananda (Paramahansa), since Paramahansa is an honorific title we did not use it)).
Now, when we had to create another article on another Nigamananda Saraswati we dropped "a" at end of the name and created Nigamanand. This spelling is alternative but incorrect spelling of person's name.

Tito Dutta (talk) 03:41, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Y First I'll try to show Nigamanand (for Nigamananda Saraswati) is incorrect spelling

Support for the spelling "Nigamananda" of Nigamananda Saraswati
Daily Bhaskar DNA Economic Times India Today Indian Express NDTV Outlook India Rediff News Tehelka The Hindu Times of India Zee News

Okay, I have given too many references. But, if you are aware of the conflicts that occurred in some Indian religion and caste related articles, then I hope you'll not mind the number here.
Now we can't move this "Nigamanand" to "Nigamananda" since the title is reserved. That's why I am requesting to move both articles to new titles and make "Nigamananda" a disambiguation page.
I am not sure where to move since both "Paramahansa" and "Saraswati" are honorific titles and may be the reason to start another RM. But, that's the only and the best solution I can find at this moment. That's all for now! Tito Dutta (talk) 03:41, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support - not that Hindi is the magic benchmark for northern India, but with both Hindi names+titles so similar स्वामी निगमानंद परमहंस (d.1935) and स्वामी निगमानंद सरस्वती (d.2011), the solution TitoDutta offers makes sense. And even though the recent Nigamananda doesn't have a hi.wp or Bangla wp page it is at this name in local media and forums. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.