Talk:Nieuwesteeg Heritage Rose Garden

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted on 4 April 2013 by reviewer Libby norman (talk · contribs).

Australia: Victoria Low‑importance

	Australia portal Nieuwesteeg Heritage Rose Garden is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Horticulture and Gardening Low‑importance

	Gardening portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Horticulture and Gardening on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horticulture and GardeningWikipedia:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningTemplate:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningHorticulture and gardening
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

From 4 November 2013 the website has been rearranged, grouping photos under rose beds. Each rose will have its photo and each photo will have its individuating horticultural and historical description. At present the neatest format seems to have the description as a caption; but other formats may prove better in future.

Not all the photos are "good" or "the best" in themselves. They have been chosen to fit into the chosen portrait shape and to aid quick matching of photo to rose in vivo. Erictimewell (talk) 22:52, 5 November 2013 (UTC) The short term plan now is to replace below-standard photos in the array, most obviously Mrs Herbert Stephens and Charlotte Armstrong. But there are others. Erictimewell (talk) 01:32, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I revisited the rose garden after nine years to find it superbly preserved and most of the roses fully mature. Rather obvious plastic name plates have been provided to most of the roses, making the website's detailed positioning redundant, but its descriptions of provenances even more helpful. As far as I can tell the haunting 'Midnight Sun' died years ago and has never been replaced. I've left it in the catalogue as a reminder that it should be. Erictimewell (talk) 06:30, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]