Talk:Nick Zangwill
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
"Removal of sourced content"
[edit]I recently made an edit to this page, which was reverted by Dr.Pinsky. This removed content was as follows:
Zangwill's logic borders on psychopathy, as demonstrated in his defense of humans eating animals for the benefit of animals.
Let me be clear. While that sentence cites a source, saying his logic "borders on psychopathy" is simple editorializing. I happen to think his logic is moronic and contemptible, but I don't think he could be diagnosed with psychopathy on that basis, and the allegation that it "borders on psychopathy" is unsourced. I will be re-removing the content. The material is inaccurate and biased and I am ill-inclined to wait around on the talk page of the Wikipedia page of an obscure philosopher for consensus before removing what was basically someone's drive-by vandalism. --67.60.78.6 (talk) 17:51, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. Regards. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 18:56, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Dr.Pinsky, please do not restore content in violation of WP:BLP. TrangaBellam (talk) 18:03, 3 February 2022 (UTC)