Jump to content

Talk:Nicholas Lens

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

COI

[edit]

I've added a COI tag to this article because it's regularly being edited by User:Artistresearch, who (I suspect) has an interest in the topic matter. The user has already been reported to the administrators. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 17:21, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

yes artistresearch is the website of the subject and is the originator of the topic< so delete the article then (if the subject is relevant and important enough somebody else will start it up again< we suggested that already but wikipedia is refusing< what is that you want then, Qwertyus..? please delete the article, apparently we can not — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artistresearch (talk • contribs) 16:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A conflict of interest does not preclude inclusion, the tag only says that it may have issues and alerts our readers of a bias that may be present. Please reliably source the article and it should be ok, it's not overly promotional. I myself have made articles I had a COI with...see Dax Charles and the disclosure I made at [[1]]. Keep everything neutral and well sourced and you will be fine and you'll be fine. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:26, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have added references and removed the notability tag as this person clearly passes WP:MUSICBIO, on the recordings alone. I would also have removed the Conflict of Interest tag as the article in its current state does not reflect a COI. However, it had been removed by an anonymous IP (94.225.81.88) registered to Belgium who also removed the clearly referenced year of birth which is a matter of public record and appears on his publisher's website as well as on numerous databases.

  • Do not remove referenced information without providing a reason and discussing it on the article's talk page.
  • Do not remove maintenance tags without providing a reason and discussing it on the article's talk page.
  • If you already have a Wikipedia account, do not edit without logging in to avoid scrutiny of your edits. Please see our policy on the inappropriate uses of alternative accounts

Voceditenore (talk) 18:29, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is it OK/relevant to add this review of the opera "Shell Shock" (I see a review of another piece is listed)? "Shell Shock" review Writie (talk) 09:43, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with List of operas by Nicholas Lens

[edit]

Not long enough for a stand alone list Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say to simply redirect List of operas by Nicholas Lens to this article. There's nothing to merge as this article already contains the information present in that list which has a sum total of 2 entries. The list was part of a concerted effort to plaster the subject's name and works all over Wikipedia (see the COI section above). Voceditenore (talk) 11:13, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No discussion after a year and there does not appear to be an objection. Created redirect per WP:BOLD. No need to merge as the content was already in this page. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:00, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Nicholas Lens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:42, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nicholas Lens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nicholas_Lens&oldid=1208145199"