Jump to content

Talk:Nicholas Ashley-Cooper, 12th Earl of Shaftesbury

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How to assign him to DJ categories

[edit]

I edited this article mainly because I stumbled across the story of the earl's succession and found it fascinating. Since he is a DJ of some renown (see the links in the article), I think he should be in the appropriate DJ categories. However, he is known as "nick ac" in the techno world, not "Shaftesbury", so I'm not sure how he should be sorted. I defaulted to sorting on "Shaftesbury" as for other categories, but I wonder if a "nick ac" entry, redirecting here, might be more suitable for categorization. However, categorizing a redirect would seem to not be good form for Wikipedia. I won't be monitoring this closely, so anyone who has a solution, please go ahead! GeoGreg 22:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dealt with by creating a small parallel article for his DJ name so that it would list correctly in the category lists and linking that back to this article. --DavidCane 01:07, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

St Giles House image rationale

[edit]

I received the image [[File:St Giles House Dorset.png]] from Nicholas Ashley-Cooper, 12th Earl of Shaftesbury with a request to switch out the image of the house. I have explained that there are no guarantees that the image will be retained in the article beyond my initial revision. I have no personal preference. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Cind.amuse 03:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Philanthropic section is definately non-notable.

[edit]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.184.62 (talkcontribs) 16:41, 30 September 2012

Article reads like a business pitch

[edit]

Article is somewhat suspect - seems to be rather too much fluff in it. London marathon paragraph / DJing section / desert race information: one gets the feeling that much has been added here to beef up the article. Not exactly a household name in dance music circles... One of course understands the notional notability of members of the peerage: however, this Ashley-Cooper doesn't seem to warrant such a large article. Often men like Asley-Cooper ride along on the coat-tails of their forebears - and the article is arguably a case in point. Much of it is not exactly notable achievements. Finished 29th in some race? Reads like an ad or a business pitch. A more notable figure could perhaps be Ashley's godfather, Gerald Grosvenor, 6th Duke of Westminster, whose article on Wikipedia is much shorter. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Grosvenor,_6th_Duke_of_Westminster — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.32.222 (talk) 17:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to agree that undue weight is currently being afforded to this information, and that it could do with being pared down. Feel free to do so yourself. Some information should be retained, and source references shouldn't be removed if they're within policy. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 10:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Date problem

[edit]

The introduction reads "Shaftesbury's father, Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 10th Earl of Shaftesbury, had been murdered in November 2004 by the brother of his third wife, Jamila M'Barek.[1] A month later, on 15 May 2005,..."

However, 15 May 2005 is not "one month" after November 2004

--23.119.204.117 (talk) 04:35, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Nicholas Ashley-Cooper, 12th Earl of Shaftesbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]