Talk:Nibling

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 June 2016. The result of the discussion was merge and redirect to Nephew and niece.

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Family and relationships (defunct)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships articles

Question

Is there's a word for nibling means sibiling's child?

Requested move 7 June 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved as consensus to keep the article at it's current name has been established. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Music1201 ^talk 04:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nibling → Sibling's offspring – Nibling is not a word commonly used. It's a neologism. Voortle (talk) 22:15, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support moving to a different name, but undecided on proposed location. I'm not completely sure whether or not there's a better term to use or not. I'll likely decide later after more discussion. –Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 22:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just delete this invented nonsense title. There is already a Niece article, a Nephew article, and {{family}}, which is present on both pages. There is no need for the contents of this article. 64.105.98.115 (talk) 02:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – the cited source says the term has gained some acceptance in anthropology. It should be possible to write it about that; if not delete. Moving away from the current title doesn't make much sense. Dicklyon (talk) 16:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.