Talk:Ngo Dinh Diem/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about Ngo Dinh Diem. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Sufficiency of information / NPOV

I believed, you need to doing more research into Ngo Dinh Diem regime in 1945. Your sources are incorrect. I only read a partial of your article and your article did not make any sense to me. Seemlike, you're leaning too much in one side of the story? Such as, you said Ngo Dinh Diem, "He rejected the Geneva accord calling for unification and elections in 1956, using a 1955 referendum he abolished the monarchy and declared himself President of South Vietnam."

A statement above have two sentences that miss-leading to the public:

1- Ngo Dinh Diem and Ho Chi Minh would like the idea about unification and elections, but Ho Chi Minh is a man changed his mind and rejected the unification and elections in 1956 from Geneva. You want to know the reason why Ho Chi Minh reject this idea? You need to reseach more about it. I can not give it to you.

2- Ngo Dinh Diem did NOT declared himself for a President of South Viet-Nam? I let you to find this out by yourself.

I hope you will write this article more closely correct...

Best Regards,

David

Be bold. Feel free to fix any mistakes yourself. LuckyWizard 02:52, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Vietnamese text added to article

Someone added the following Vietnamese text to the article:

ngo dinh diem la mot con nguoi toi vo cung kham phuc,tuy toi la nguoi sinh ra sua chien tranh nhung qua cac tai lieu tham khao toi thay ong la mot nguoi dang kham phuc

Does anyone know what it means? LuckyWizard 02:52, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)

This text is pseudo-Vietnamese since doesn't contain diacritics and thus any translation is largely guesswork. The author is merely expressing his personal opinion about the subject. Roughly translated, the text says:

Ngo Dinh Diem is a person I revere very much, although I was born after(?) the war but through reference documents I feel that he is a person who should be respected.

Unsupported attribution

U.S. President Lyndon Johnson declared Diem the "Churchill of Asia." In truth, Johnson held Diem and his regime in contempt.

I agree with David partly, a statement like the one above is not backed by anything. How do you know he held Diem and his regime in contempt? Don't get me wrong I am not saying he did not, I am only saying we don't kow or is there backing for this in the Pentagon Papers or something similar?

It should also maybe be pointed out that Bao Dai himself was nothing but a puppet of the French in their attempt to recolonize Vietnam.

the imprisonment and execution of hundreds of Buddhists I have never heard of that, tell me I am worng but honestly i very much doubt he executed hundreds of Buddhists and if he did, he did most likely not do it because they were Buddhists, by which I am not trying to defend his politics nor policies towards Buddhism especially during the Monk Uprising but especially criticism should be justified and backed by facts.

the American ambassador in Saigon, refused to meet with Diem and encouraged military officers to overthrow him true of course, but it should also be pointed out that these officers had contacted the Kennedy Administration before with the question of how Vietnam would be treated if they overthrew Diem's government, also Cabot did not form a decision like that on his own, but ultimately it was Kennedy's

J-Dub 14 November 13:56

'U.S. President Lyndon Johnson declared Diem the "Churchill of Asia." In truth, Johnson held Diem and his regime in contempt.'

As it stands, the statement must be wrong, since Diem was killed at the beginning of November 1963, while Johnson did not become President of the USA until some three weeks later. John G Walker 13:25, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Johnson was the VICE-President of the United States until then, so it stands to reason that he could have said something while still Vice President, your logic is weak in that just because he is referred to as President Johnson does not necessarily mean that he was president at the time he said it.

date of death

Can someone confirm if Ngo Dinh Diem died on November 1st or 2nd in 1963, please ? Thanks. -- PFHLai 13:08, 2004 Oct 28 (UTC)

On the Vietnam War page it says that he left office on the 1st and was killed on the 2nd. Hope that helps.Murdochious 16:34, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Â216.160.22.82 22:37, 15 November 2006 (UTC)== various NPOV changes ==

I edited the "U.S. ties" section broadly, to remove patent bias in some areas and to revise nbnvhgfffffffffgfhhfhfhf

Last name

Which is the last name (family name, surname) of this guy? Diem and Ngo? — Instantn ood 03:04, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)

His last name is "Ngo." In many languages, Vietnamese included, the surname is generally listed first. "Dinh Diem" is his given name.

--Ryanaxp 16:35, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)

But then in the article (in fact in many articles about Vietnamese people) Ngo Dinh Diem is referred to by Diem instead of Ngo. -- 14:56, January 25, 2005, UTC

No only so on Wikipedia. Even on American publications about the Vietnamese War (interestingly its literally called United States War in Vietnam) Vietnamese people are referred to by the last word of their names. — Instantn

Well, you wouldn't quite expect the Vietnamese to call it "the Vietnam War," any more than you would expect Caesar to have referred to the invasion of Gaul as "the Rome war," no? :)

In any event, the phrase most commonly used among Vietnamese translates more aptly to the "American war," not particularly the "United States war" (although the distinction is ambiguous at times, in Vietnamese as in English).

--Ryanaxp 14:31, May 5, 2005 (UTC)

ood 15:01, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)

This article on BBC, and this article on the websste of Vietnamese embassy in US call Phan Van Khai, the current Vietnamese PM, "Mr Khai". — Insta ntnood 10:14, May 5, 2005 (UTC)

Vietnamese people are usually referred to by their given names instead of their family names. Thus NGÔ Đình Diệm is usually referred to as Diệm, VÕ Nguyên Giáp is referred to as Giáp, NGUYỄN Cao Kỳ is referred to as Kỳ, PHAN Văn Khải is referred to as Khải, etc. However, there are certain exceptions, as in the case of HỒ Chí Minh, who is referred to as Hồ, but that is a rare case (it's an alias, not a real name). If everyone is referred to by their family names, half of the country would be called Mr./Ms./Mrs. Nguyễn and another quarter Mr./Ms./Mrs. Trần. DHN 06:04, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

According to the Chinese Wikipedia version of this article, the surname is Ngo Dinh, and the given name is Diem. This is due to the fact that the daughter of Diem's brother is called Ngo Dinh Le Thuy. If only Ngo is the surname, then the daughter in question would have been named Ngo Le Thuy.

Make sure you read this!!! Arbiteroftruth 01:02, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

You mean Ngo Le Thuy ? -- PFHLai 15:39, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Title of article in English wikipedia

This morning, a wikipedian moved this page to a version including the full Vietnamese diacritics. I just moved it back to the version without diacritics, for the following reasons:

this is the English-language article about Ngo; and the great majority of English text written about Ngo (and other Vietnamese generally) do not include diacritics. In English, in fact, inclusion of the diacritics is of no effect (at best) or even confusing because they have no effect on pronunciation in standard English orthography. (Please note I am by no means an English-language bigot: I am a student of the Vietnamese language, and understand the fundamental role diacritic marks fulfill in correctly differentiating phonemes in Vietnamese. However, it is clear that in English, the diacritics play no role in pronunciation.)
The Wikipedia guidelines on naming conventions asserts that the most commonly used spelling in English is the form that should be used.

--Ryanaxp 15:20, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)

Ngo or Ngo Dinh?

According to the Chinese version of Wikipedia, Diem's surname is supposed to be Ngo Dinh, instead of Ngo, as it would be perceived. That is because the name of the Diem's niece was Ngo Dinh (name here, but I do not know Vietnamese, so I won't type it).

So is Diem's surname just Ngo? Or is it Ngo Dinh? --Arbiteroftruth 07:17, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

It appears that you might be correct. Some people have compound surnames composed of their parents' surnames if they both come from prominent families. Both Ngô and Đình are legitimate surnames. A Google search for "họ Ngô Đình" (the surname Ngô Đình) yielded some references to scholarly works referring to such a clan. DHN 07:34, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

The surname is simply Ngô. In the Vietnamese culture (speaking of my own), the given name is divided into a few parts. Đình may have been a courtesy name that is inherited continuously down the generation line. Diem is his given name. For example, the last dynasty is Nguyễn Dynasty. However, all of the emperors have the surname of Nguyễn and courtesy name of Phúc. Hope this clears up some confusions. --68.239.204.87 02:26, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Have you, who came to be interested in this topic, ever been in the time ruling of this man over south Vietnam or known him directly through contact? History has spoken for itself, now if he was good or bad would not be a matter anymore because he was dead, he was murdered!!! The point is please be more precise when speaking about him because he could not speak for himself. He just wanted to defend south Vietnam from falling into communism, infact we have already seen what it was. Don.

For those of you who keeps on deleting the fact that Diem's surname is Ngo Ding, and not Ngo, please read this translated section from the Chinese Wikipedia

Original Text 吳廷琰的弟弟吳廷瑈與其妻陳麗春（一般稱之為吳廷瑈夫人或瑈夫人）育有二女二子，長女為吳廷麗水，由此看來此家族似乎為複姓吳廷，而非吳姓。此外，由於吳廷琰終身未婚，他在擔任總統期間，亦由弟婦陳麗春擔當第一夫人的角色。　　

Translation Ngo Dinh Diem's brother, Ngô Ðình Nhu, and his wife, Trần Lệ Xuân (known as Madame Ngô Ðình Nhu), have two sons and daughters. The eldest daughter's name is Ngô Ðình Lệ Thuy. This means the family's surname appears to be the compound surname Ngô Ðình. Due to the fact Diem was a lifelong bachelor, Madame Ngô Ðình Nhu was effectively the first lady of South Vietnam during Diem's Presidency.

This is proof that Diem's surname is Ngô Ðình, and not just Ngô.

Please, for the love of all things holy, stop changing it. -Arbiteroftruth 01:49, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

I am very sure his last name is "Ngo" - a lot of people like to propagate their middle names within their family, I do not see how this implies that their last name is their "surname" + "middle" name. For example, George Bush (43) is George Walker Bush and his father (41) is George Herbert Walker Bush. I don't think we can infer that because people propagate their middle names that the surname then becomes "Ngo Dinh". The fact that the chinese wikipedia uses this, I feel does not mean that it is correct - although the article is about an extremely prominent politician, none of it is sourced and it is basically all speculation. All of the males on my mother's side of the family have the format "SURNAME MIDDLENAME" with the same middle name, and they call themselves the "PHI" family, and this is the case for all purposes, official and unofficial, even in Anglophonic format "MIDDLENAME SURNAME" .Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 01:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes, a lot of people like to propagate their middle names within their family. Do this enough times, it may become "official" and the simple surname becomes a compound surname (unless the original gets displaced.) Blnguyen's family may be going through this process. Whether the Nguyen family of Bl becomes PHI is up to them. According to Chinese Wikipedia here, the surname of the royal family in the Nguyễn Dynasty changed from Nguyễn (阮) to Nguyễn Phúc (阮福) in their third generation, citing some redlinked ancient text. Do we know for sure Ngo Dinh Diem's surname is Ngô Ðình or Ngô ? Was an official change from Ngô to Ngô Ðình made earlier in history ? If the change was made by Diem's ancestors, the proper surname should be Ngô Ðình. Same goes for Ngô Ðình Lệ Thuy. (However, Lệ (麗) is repeated from her mother's name. Something is up, here.) What is the origin of the surname Ngô Ðình / Ngô? Anyway, just want to say that if we are not sure if Ngo Dinh Diem's surname is Ngô Ðình or Ngô, it should not appear so definite on the top of the article. -- PFHLai 15:59, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Devoutly Catholic vs Anti-Buddhist

I kept the reference to him being anti-Buddhist because of his raiding of Buddhist temples. I also kept the reference to him being devoutly Catholic, so hopefully the anonymous editors will leave it alone for now. If I'm wrong about this, please tell me and maybe we can resolve this. Primetime 11:08, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Prove that Buddhists are communists
- Nothing in the article is proven. Unless we intend to delete all unsourced material in the article, we should keep everything except that which is proven to be untrue. Your reversion seems to be somewhat biased because you have kept the remaining information in the article. There is no double standard vis-à-vis the remaining information. --Primetime 03:05, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

U.S. / Democracy

I removed the line saying that the U.S. "realized that the Republic of South Viet Nam was by far the most democratic government the people of Viet Nam has ever experienced". This is irrelevant. Whether it was the most 'democratic' government Vietnam had experienced or not, the U.S. was still denying the Vietnamese the right to elect their own government.

I don't object to the deletion; it seems an unnecessary aside. However, I seriously question the reason for it. At what point would you think democratic elections would be possible? How can you "deny" someone something that they would never have had?

Hoya1 23:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Unreliability of Information

Simply put, I would imagine most of the articles regarding any aspect of the Vietnam war to be mostly speculation. Between the U.S. government releasing nothing (or damn near close to nothing ) with regards to their internal planning sessions during the war and the Vietnamese government releasing certifiably nothing with regards to their actions, most everyone can claim a lack of credentials to arbitrate the truth of this matter, or anything surrounding the Vietnam war. That said, this isn't really about anything in the article that hasn't been said already, save that most of it (especially around the end) drifts off into questionably ambiguous and unsupported grounds, -- Walk0nwalls 18:00, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

I would agree that most information may be subject to people's personal opinions, but the fact of the matter is that most things are. It is difficult to establish what is fact from what is someone's perception of something. There is plenty of source material on Vietnam available, the Pentagon Papers, the White House recordings, Foreign Relations of the United States, the State Department Bulletins, CIA and the Vietnam Policymakers, and the list goes on, the problem is that one must interpret these documents in the correct light. The Pentagon Papers were produced at the order of Robert McNamara, in an attempt to create a record of the U.S. role in Vietnam. It stands to reason that there was a lot at stake for the individuals involved, namely careers, and that the conclusions of such documents shed light on this fact, what people thought at the time, not necessarily what REALLY happened. The same would be true of the secret documents that you speak of.

I have added link to Avro Manhattan's book on Vietnam War.Bharatveer 05:19, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Fair use?

The photo of the Times it's said to be for fair use. Here, it says: "Here are a few examples of uses that would almost certainly not be acceptable as fair use: 7. An image of a magazine cover, used only to illustrate the article on the person whose photograph is on the cover. However, if that magazine issue itself is notable enough to be a topic within the article, then fair use may apply." I think this photo shoud be removed from the article. --Xtv - (my talk) - (que dius que què?) 14:40, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

If it stays, it should give the date of the issue. It should be left in the article, but in a manner consistent with Fair Use. This would be easy, because the cover nicely illustrates the dramatic change in Diem's standing in America: how he went from a popular figure with the official support of the US government, to a target of assassination. But first this requires the addition of a date for the cover, followed by some text to this effect. 66.188.6.131 22:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

It's okay to put the magazine cover next to the relevant text. To use the cover as the portrait of the subject, that's not fair use. I've removed it for the time being. --PFHLai 22:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

You are wrong on this, but I am not going to get into an edit war over it. Fair Use tags state that

"This image is a scan of a cover of an issue of TIME magazine, and the copyright for it is held by Time Warner, the parent company of TIME. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of TIME magazine covers used...

* to illustrate an article, or part of an article, which specifically describes the issue in question or its cover

Not only does the article quote directly from the Time issue in question, but it also mentions how the US tried to build Diem up as a leader in the 1950s (as illustrated by the Time cover), before agreeing to his removal in a coup in 1963. You have made this an inferior article. Cripipper 10:57, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Cripipper, use it. I repeat: "It's okay to put the magazine cover next to the relevant text." That's to "illustrate an article, or part of an article, which specifically describes the issue in question or its cover", but do not place the image in the infobox where the subject's portrait goes (See Wikipedia:Fair_use#Counterexamples, #7.) Use it in the article ! Beef up the text. Even explain what the lotus, the torn flag and the sickle mean in the image caption.

Just don't use it as Diem's portrait in the infobox. By doing that, you have abused "fair use". -- PFHLai 13:10, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

And, don't forget to include a detailed fair use rationale, as per Wikipedia:Image description page#Fair use rationale, in the image description page. (The last sentence in the fair use tag.) Thanks. --PFHLai 13:20, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

No, it is fine to use it in the infobox, if it is within the terms of Fair Use. You may not use it to illustrate a biography if it is only being used for that purpose (as it clearly says in the counterexamples). It does not say you cannot use it in the Infobox, if such a usage is within the terms of Fair Use, and using this picture in this article is. But that is by the by, I have long since given up trying to persuade people who adopt an over-zealously literal interpretation of guidelines. Cripipper 13:35, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, then, I won't try to persuade you to stop the liberal interpretation of the same guidelines. Please feel free to put the magazine cover in the article next to the relevant text, Cripipper, before another admin comes along and deletes this "fairuse but not used" image. --PFHLai 14:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Ghosts?

In the Coup and Assassination section there is talk of Ngo's ghost avenging his death. Where did this idea come from? Since it has no source at all it seems difficult to leave such superstition in an encyclopedia. Any sources anyone? --Hydraton31 19:16, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Being vietnamese, i have heard of this supertition before from many people. however i am not sure where i can find a definitive source to support this idea.--Dvdlm

Neutrality (and also clarity) issues

Among the many who know of the political situations surrounding his death (1963), Ngô Đình Diệm's assassination was considered as the decisive political moment that, according to some, led gradually to the Vietnam War ''loss'''' 12 years later (1975), but, according to others, prevented South Vietnam from being lost 12 years earlier because Diệm had already decided to get rid of American influence and yield to Ho Chi Minh's invasive ambitions

The above quoted text is not strictly neutral e.g. war 'loss' - this depends on whose side you consider 'winning' etc. It is also very unclear, especially when it talks about '12 years' earlier/later.--ToyotaPanasonic 13:46, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

comment

Information on this article of Ngo Dinh Diem contains mostly biases and false information that has been generated by US government and VN communists. 90% of the article is false information to make NDD seem like a bad person when he wasn't. This is the work of US government and VN communists. Wiki shouldn't support it by posting false information on this webpage and mislead the world's readers. Please do the world a favor by posting accurate information, if not, don't post at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Baby4eva (talk • contribs) 20:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Please then state what is false in this article and suggest changes, do this or don't post at all. Thannad (talk) 01:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

exiled to china

why would he be exiled to china if hes openly anti communist? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.139.62.233 (talk) 00:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC).

Ngo Dinh Diem from Ocean County, NJ?

Diem appears on a list of "people from Ocean County, NJ" - just a guess but I think this is wildly inaccurate —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.84.162.6 (talk) 21:35, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Moyar and WP:RS

The views of Moyar are very much fringe. Moyar notes so himself, that he is a revisionist. He is attempting to overturn academic historical establishment on what is fact. Many of factual events that he records as having taken place directly contradict the records of the established history, and Moyar is frequently stating in the book that the account of events by the orthodox historians is false and spends much of the book attempting to discredit the historical events they describe. So it is definitely fringe and does not even really pass WP:RS since his version of events contradicts what is accepted. WP:NOT states under the headline Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought point 1 that

“

Wikipedia will report about your work once it becomes part of accepted knowledge

”

Moyar's work is as yet not accepted knowledge, since his attempt to debunk "orthodox-fact" has with "revisionism-fact" has not yet changed the consensus of what Diem did. I am not referring to what people evaluate of Diem, but black and white statements about what events happened and what did not. As such I do not believe his claims and attempts to reestablish another sequence of events can be considered to be taken as a reliable source. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

WP:UNDUE is quite clear about this. It says,

“

Views held only by a tiny minority of people should not be represented as significant minority views, and perhaps should not be represented at all.

”

If Moyar or atleast his book as opposed to his views are notable and encyclopedic, then one might actually create an article for the book and then present a summary of his views there(in NPOV fashion ofcourse and not as a matter of fact). And btw, almost every reviewer and review of the book is unanimous that the book is revisionist. That it overturns accepted historical facts. It would no doubt make for interesting reading, but his views surely cant fight for space on this article. Sarvagnya 08:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Being an encyclopedia, only popular theories are acceptable. fringe theories such as the book by Moyar is better of in a different article.Dineshkannambadi 11:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

While there may be a dispute over the number of Buddhists, the consensus is that Buddhists formed the majority in South Vietnam. Moyar may be notable, but writing full fledged biography based on one man's view is not NPOV.Baka man 16:35, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Especially when the source that Moyar cites for 27% Buddhist is a CIA report and the CIA helped organised and promote Diem's rise to power, they have a COI and the report cannot be taken to be indepenedent. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Since Moyar is a self proclaimed minority viewpoint revisionist, and since he seeks to overturn established historical fact, he cannot be taken to be a reliable source for describing factual events or statistics. — Nearly Headless Nick ^{C} 08:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

I agree as well. - Y (Y NOT?) 14:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Moyars views may be fringe, especially among western scholars, but his material is new. Much of the statistics and information he published is new to the spotlight, and thus should be aired. Does anyone know how the Communists in Vietnam view Diem as a fighter of Communism? I do not mean morally, as they most certainly view him poorly there, but as a talented leader. I believe if they did view him as a talented leader, those views should be aired also. I remember reading from a governmental historian, that under his rule, in 1959-1963, 9 out of 10 party members in the south were killed or capturedTridungvo 13:16, 31 May 2007 (UTC),

Found the source: http://www.dsp.org.au/links/back/issue27/Nguyen.htm I'm sure there's more information from the Communist side that confirm his talent in fighting the them.Tridungvo 14:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Piero Gheddo and RS

Looking again at Moyar's book, some of his counter-statistics are sourced to a book called the "The Cross and the Bo-Tree". Gheddo is an Italian Roman Catholic priest. He is an active missionary trying to convert people to Catholicism (see google). On the blurb of the book, it says that his credentials include being a magazine editor for the Second Vatican Council. Also note that Ngo Dinh Thuc, brother and advisor of Ngo Dinh Diem, who lived in the same Presidential Palace in Saigon, was the Archbishop of Hue, and was a member of the Vatican voting conclave for the papacy. Thuc was one of the most powerful figures of the Vatican in Asia. As such, these statistics can in no way be taken to be reliable at all. Imagine using a Fatah or Hamas website for statistics about Israel, or Tamilnation for statistics about the Govt of Sri Lanka. The fact that Moyar takes information written in a book by a missionary of the same church of an archbishop who is the brother of the country's President, and tries to use this to reveal "truth" speaks volumes about him. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:55, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

This book "The Cross and the Bo-Tree" seems to be a propaganda oriented material, well connected at the highest levels to those attempting to propagate a revisionist theory.Dineshkannambadi 12:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm not defending the source where it came from, but the 27% figure, at least in Moyar's book, was a figure for the percentage of South Vietnamese who were strongly observant Buddhists, not for the percentage of people in South Vietnam who were Buddhist.91.17.176.36 (talk) 00:40, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

All information on the Buddhist movement and self-immolization are false. Stop posting false information or you will look like you support the Communist with these lies. There are proven documentaries on this Buddhist movement that it was a cover-up. Your moderators are communist-supporters if they keep changing people's edits for documenting truthful facts of this historic events.

% Buddhists

Time magazine article [1] - 80%
Maclear, p63 -> 95%
Dr Charles Fasanaro, Santa Fe, NM, Encyc of Vietnam War p49 (ed Spencer C. Tucker) -> 80%
Dr Cecil B. Currey, U S Florida, Encyc of Vietnam War p291 (ed Spencer C. Tucker) -> "predominately" [sic]
William Head, Encyc of Vietnam War p293 (ed Spencer C. Tucker) -> "most"
Frank N Trager, Professor NYU, pg366 in Gettleman -> "majority"
David Halberstam, Pulitzer Prize, Gettleman p275 -> 69-76%
- Note that contrary to the claims in Moyar's book that Halberstam got this statistic from communists, Halberstam in the article notes that it was an estimate by the "Asia Foundation" a non-profit US organisation.
[Wesley Fishel, Professor MSU, Gettleman's book -> "largely"

CIA report: 27%
- CIA agent Edward Lansdale was Diem's advisor who helped him into power.

Google results

(12)[2] - "predominantly"
(15)[3] "70-80%"
(19)[4] "80%"
(21) This site is an encyclopedia, but may not be very good [5] - 66% in 1995....Has Buddhism increased during Communism?
(29) [6] - "predominantly"
(30) [7] - "In an eerie parallel, the percentage of Sunni Muslims to Shiites in Iraq is roughly that of the Catholic-Buddhist ratio in Vietnam in the 1950s."

These are the google results for academic publications in the top 30

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:50, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Merely a note to widely acclaimed figure David Halberstam would have been enough to debunk Moyar.Baka man 02:01, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Question

What was Diem and Nhu's political party called, again? The name escapes me. 71.193.93.176 12:08, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Can Lao. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Edit Question

In the 'Aftermath' section of this article, is there something wrong with the last word of the article? I'm pretty sure it's supposed to be 'communism' rather than 'colonialism.'

No it's correct. Diem was known for taking a lot of US aid money and not doing what he was told. The subsequent junta allowed more US personnel etc and towed the line more, and they got a worse reputation for being American puppets than Diem did. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:06, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

azzu Qrex

بجعن اس قرك قوق β̞ɑjɪŋɢ̆ɑɳ ₳₴₴₪ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.103.175.12 (talk) 15:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Need to have accurate info on his grave

Why is there no info on his grave? According to every magazine and newspaper accessible on the net, he was first buried in an unmarked grave at the military headquarters by the airport, then moved to an unmarked grave in Mac Dinh Chi cemetery in 1965, then in 1983 moved to his parents' cemetery in the province. Also, the "cemetery next to the house of the U.S. ambassador" is really Mac Dinh Chi cemetery, and should be identified as such. It's only 4 short blocks away from the embassy building, if you look at an old map of Saigon.GLY63 (talk) 03:20, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Pronunciation of the name

The one given now contradicts the data in the Vietnamese phonology article; iə's should be substituted for jə's 89.231.110.85 (talk) 17:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)