Talk:Newton-in-Bowland

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

UK geography Start‑class Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The "Manor" of Newton

Would the unfortunate person who bought the "manor" of Newton in good faith from Manorial Auctioneers kindly check the HM Registry records for 1950, 1977, 2003 relating to the Manor & Liberty of Slaidburn. They plainly show that the township of Newton is part of the Manor of Slaidburn and thus owned by Thomas Assheton. Lord O'Hagan had no legal right to sell the non-existent "manor" of Newton in February 2011. The purchaser needs to refer back to his solicitor Rollasons on this matter as he has been misled.

Would the purchaser please contact the Asshetons' land agent Michael Parkinson at michael.parkinson@inghamandyorke.co.uk to discuss this matter? It is part of a pattern of unauthorised sales of manorial rights owned by the Assheton family.

Manorial (talk)

Wikipedia is not about the personal views of a single person, it is about collecting a number of published sources such as books, academic articles, and news stories and summarising that information (correctly referenced) into an (hopefully interesting) objective article. For further information on what Wikipedia in not see WP:Not

Information that does not come from a published source is unlikely to be suitable for this website either on the grounds of notability (See: WP:Note) or that in constitutes original research (See: WP:NOR).

I would be well within my rights to remove all the info on who currently owns this title as is poorly referenced and about as notable as who lives at no. 13.

As this has been tried before and it just keeps coming back, I’m going to pause for a while to do some research and discuss options with any experienced editors who have an interest. Editors should be aware that it is possible block IP addresses from editing (as well as usernames) even if they belong to an institution such as a college. --Trappedinburnley (talk) 23:05, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trappedinburnley, I share your view. We need to gather the evidence and reach a definitive position. I can provide you with ample evidence that there is no "manor" of Newton if you wish to offer me your email address. In my view, "lordofnewton"/"neautone1" should be banned immediately pending a decision.

Manorial (talk) 13:45, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Newton-in-Bowland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:27, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]