Talk:Newham Community Constabulary

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

References

Can someone help me out with references? I always make a balls-up of putting them in.

If I list the statement and then the reference, could someone help me out?

Those titles have been identified as being misleading as employees of the service are council workers rather than police officers.

This was identified in an report http://www.newham.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/CBA97462-455D-4031-AF69-1376FDF1B4AA/0/ImprovementPlanV9.pdf

that stated that "The Council should review the use of police titles/ranks for these more senior posts and consider titles which do not imply that the post holders are serving police officers but confirm their status as council officers".

Categories?

Since official reports have identified that a) those have no crime powers of arrest and b) are council employees and should not be called officers and the like. Is this actually part of the "UK Police Forces" category? --Charlesknight 14:25, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

use of MPS Stop and search forms

There is an article in private eye this week about the illegal use of MPS Stop and search forms by those council employees with accusation that the impression was given to the shop keeper that the person he was dealing with was an MPS officer - it is also made reference to in this letter here to the Newham Recorder. The original story in the Newham Recorder in on the 28th Novemeber but I am unable to find it on their site - anyone have more luck? --87.114.130.55 (talk) 16:39, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The private eye issue is dated 20th dec and is issue 1120 - I an unable to find the orginal article, the letter is referring to. --Fredrick day (talk) 17:29, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eh can't include everything private says about the Constabulary it would take up raher a lot of space.Geni 16:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Newham Community Constabulary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]