Talk:Newfoundland pony/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 05:06, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
I'll start this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:06, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
- External links are good and no DABs
- Pics appropriately licensed.
- Can you link to the Canadian Animal Pedigree Act?
- We don't have an article on it. I've played around with creating one, but so far haven't found enough in-depth sources to be sure that it's actually notable enough for an article. More research into this is on my to-do list, though. Dana boomer (talk) 14:09, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
- What does this mean? Pinto horses may not be registered. They don't meet the breed standards because of their coloration?
- Yes, I rephrased that a bit, pending Dana doing a check. --MTBW
- What do you mean by driving horses?
- Rephrased slightly and wikilinked. Does that help? --MTBW
- The titles of the rest of your references are in title case, do the same for Fraser.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:23, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Popped by and tweaked a couple things, Dana is lead though, so I shall defer to her on checking my answers and changes. (MTBW)- Montanabw(talk) 06:07, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, Sturm. I think between Montana and I we've addressed your points above? Dana boomer (talk) 14:09, 6 October 2013 (UTC)