Talk:Newcomb ball/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- Has reliable sources
- A lot of unsourced statements. - Is written neutrally - Mostly, not completely.
- No valid cleanup tags
- Is relatively stable with no edit wars
- Not specifically concerned with a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint
- Overall not ready. Recommend another peer review before coming back to GAN. iMatthew talk at 16:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)